|
| 也谈40年前“两个凡是”的一段公案 |
| A Reflection on a Complicated Legal Case over “Two Any Words” 40 Years Ago |
| |
| DOI： |
| 中文关键词: 真理标准问题讨论；"两个凡是”；现代迷信；历史公案 |
| 英文关键词: Truth Standard Debate; “Two Any Words” ; Modern Superstition; Historical Legal Case |
| 基金项目: |
|
|
| 摘要点击次数: 9980 |
| 全文下载次数: 0 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 笔者以参与者的身份回顾了关于 40年前"两个凡是的一段公案，在列举大量事实的基础上指出：1978年5月11日《光明日报》所发表的《实践是检验真理的唯一标准》就是针对“两个凡是”而发的；由该文引发的真理标准大讨论，则是在中央最高层次、最深意义上的与"两个凡是”的斗争。笔者对学界一度流传的真理标准问题讨论不是针对"两个凡是”的观点提出了质疑。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Based on the personal involvement in the complicated legal case of “Two Any Words” 40 years ago and abundant historical proofs, the author of this paper pointed out that the article “The Only Standard to Testify Truth Is Practice” carried in Guangming Daily on May 11 of 1978 was pointed towards the claim of “Two Any Words” and the hot debate ignited by this article had been meant to be a part of the strugle against the claim of “Two Any Words”by the core levels of the Central Party Commite. This paper called into the question the popular belief among some scholars that the debate on truth standard had not been directed to “Two Any Words”. |
| HTML
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
