|
知识产权价值与知识产权侵权损失的司法认定 |
Intellectual Property Value and Judicial Identification of Infringement Losses of Intellectual Property |
|
DOI: |
中文关键词: 知识产品价值;知识产权价值;侵权损失 |
英文关键词: knowledge product value, intellectual property value, infringement loss |
基金项目: |
|
摘要点击次数: 86 |
全文下载次数: 0 |
中文摘要: |
知识产权的客体是知识产品,其价值取决于知识产品的价值。知识产品的价值由被利用的公共知识价值、生产者的劳动价值和被消耗的物质资料的价值三部分构成。知识产权是知识产品独占性需求的法律形式,其价值是知识产品的垄断性用益价值,等于授权期间知识产品商业化应用所实现的物质性利益的价值总和。知识产权侵权损失司法认定的困惑有科学发展水平、思维范式、经济社会治理水平和法律制度等。知识产权侵权损失的认定应该遵循商业价值实际损失、合理权重和损失与获利就高不就低等原则,并采用权利人商业价值减损法、获利人毛利润增加法、权重计算法等价值计算方法和控制者自证其当原则的举证责任分配方法。 |
英文摘要: |
The object of intellectual property is knowledge products, and its value depends on the value of those products. The value of knowledge products consists of three parts: the value of utilized public knowledge, the labor value of the producer, and the value of consumed material resources. Intellectual property is the legal form of exclusive demand for knowledge products, and its value lies in the monopolistic usufructuary value of these products, which equals the sum of the material benefits realized through the commercial application of knowledge products during the authorization period. Judicial identification of intellectual property infringement losses faces challenges related to the level of scientific development, thinking paradigm, governing level of economic society, and legal systems. The identification of intellectual property infringement losses should follow such principles as actual commercial value loss, reasonable weighting, and selection of the greater amount of loss or profit. Value calculation methods include the right holder's commercial value reduction method, the profit earner's gross profit increase method, and the weighting calculation method, along with the principle of the controller self-proving its legitimacy for the allocation of burden of proof. |
HTML
查看全文
下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |
|
|
|